In the event of a disagreement between two appraisers over an umpire, what type of umpire will the court appoint?

In situations where there is a disagreement between two appraisers during the appraisal process, the court typically appoints an umpire who is both uninterested and impartial. This ensures that the umpire has no stake in the outcome of the appraisal, allowing for a fair and unbiased assessment of the damages or claims in question.

An uninterested umpire does not have personal, financial, or professional ties to either party involved in the dispute, which eliminates any potential conflict of interest. Being impartial means that the umpire will evaluate the evidence presented with no preconceived notions or bias towards either side, focusing solely on the evidence and facts at hand. This impartial stance is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the appraisal process and ensuring that the resolution is just and equitable for all parties involved.

The qualities of being uninterested and impartial are critical because they help to foster trust in the appraisal process, ensuring that both parties feel that the resolution will be fair and based on objective criteria rather than personal biases or interests.